paintplus: vendor the app source and rename from EditmaskwithAI
Bring the full EditmaskwithAI application into the repo under paintplus/ (429 files) so the service is self-contained — the installer copies the vendored source to ~/docker/paintplus/src instead of cloning at runtime. Rename to PaintPlus (service + branding; app logic untouched): - services/editmaskwithai.sh -> services/paintplus.sh (register_service paintplus, install_paintplus, ~/docker/paintplus, Caddy paintplus:8000, Authelia option preserved) - container names -> paintplus across docker-compose*.yml; dev network -> paintplus-network - browser <title> -> "PaintPlus - AI Image Editor"; README heading -> PaintPlus with upstream provenance note - README utilities table: editmaskwithai -> paintplus Backend/frontend code (help strings referencing the old container name, the ai_photo_edit.db filename) is intentionally left as-is to avoid touching application logic. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Nb2vJ8W7bHKx1JXVvpCraH
This commit is contained in:
Claude
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
|
||||
# AI Provider Cost & Quality Comparison
|
||||
|
||||
## Provider Options for Inpainting/Image Editing
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. OpenAI DALL-E 2 ❌ (Not Recommended)
|
||||
**Current implementation uses this when `AI_PROVIDER=openai`**
|
||||
|
||||
**Pricing:**
|
||||
- $0.020 per image (1024x1024)
|
||||
- $0.018 per image (512x512)
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality:** ⭐⭐ (2/5)
|
||||
- Old model (2022)
|
||||
- Significantly lower quality than DALL-E 3
|
||||
- Cannot match ChatGPT web interface
|
||||
- Often produces artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Simple API
|
||||
- Fast responses
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- Poor quality by modern standards
|
||||
- Limited to 1024x1024 max
|
||||
- No access to DALL-E 3 inpainting
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict:** ❌ Don't use unless you need the cheapest option and quality doesn't matter
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Stability AI (Stable Diffusion XL) ✅ (Good Choice)
|
||||
**Direct API to Stability AI**
|
||||
|
||||
**Pricing:**
|
||||
- Credits-based system
|
||||
- ~$0.010 per image (512x512)
|
||||
- ~$0.040 per image (1024x1024)
|
||||
- Must buy credit packs ($10 minimum = 1000 credits)
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality:** ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)
|
||||
- Excellent inpainting quality
|
||||
- Good at following prompts
|
||||
- Natural-looking results
|
||||
- Well-suited for photo editing
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Built specifically for inpainting
|
||||
- Good quality-to-cost ratio
|
||||
- Reliable API
|
||||
- Fast generation (15-30 seconds)
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- Requires credit purchase upfront
|
||||
- Limited to SDXL models
|
||||
- Less flexible than Replicate
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict:** ✅ Best balance of quality and cost for direct API
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Replicate ⭐ (Most Flexible)
|
||||
**API marketplace with multiple models**
|
||||
|
||||
**Pricing:** Pay-per-second of GPU time
|
||||
- SDXL Inpainting: ~$0.0023/sec (~$0.01-0.03 per image)
|
||||
- Kandinsky 2.2: ~$0.0023/sec (~$0.01-0.02 per image)
|
||||
- LaMa (removal): ~$0.0005/sec (~$0.002 per image)
|
||||
- Varies by model and parameters
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality:** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5 - depends on model choice)
|
||||
- Access to multiple models
|
||||
- Can choose best model for each use case
|
||||
- Community models available
|
||||
- Often better than Stability direct
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Multiple models to choose from
|
||||
- Pay only for what you use (no minimums)
|
||||
- Can use free models
|
||||
- New models added regularly
|
||||
- Fine-tuned models available
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- More complex to implement
|
||||
- Pricing varies by model
|
||||
- Need to understand different models
|
||||
|
||||
**Best Models on Replicate:**
|
||||
- **SDXL Inpainting**: General purpose, excellent quality
|
||||
- **LaMa**: Best for object removal
|
||||
- **Kandinsky 2.2**: Good alternative to SDXL
|
||||
- **ControlNet Inpainting**: More control over results
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict:** ⭐ Most flexible, best value if you implement multiple models
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Local Models (Self-Hosted) 💰 (Best Quality, No Per-Use Cost)
|
||||
|
||||
**Pricing:**
|
||||
- $0 per image after setup
|
||||
- Requires GPU (RTX 3060 12GB minimum, RTX 4090 ideal)
|
||||
- Cloud GPU: $0.30-$1.00/hour (RunPod, Vast.ai)
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality:** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
|
||||
- Best possible quality
|
||||
- Full control over model selection
|
||||
- Can use latest open-source models
|
||||
- No API limitations
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup Costs:**
|
||||
- GPU hardware: $300-$2000
|
||||
- OR Cloud GPU rental: $0.30-$1.00/hour
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Unlimited usage once set up
|
||||
- Best quality available
|
||||
- Complete privacy
|
||||
- No API rate limits
|
||||
- Can fine-tune models
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- Requires GPU or cloud rental
|
||||
- More complex setup
|
||||
- Slower than cloud APIs (if CPU only)
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict:** 💰 Best long-term if you have GPU or high volume
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Stability AI vs Replicate: What's the Difference?
|
||||
|
||||
### Stability AI (stability.ai)
|
||||
**What it is:**
|
||||
- The company that created Stable Diffusion
|
||||
- Direct API to their hosted models
|
||||
- Official source
|
||||
|
||||
**Business Model:**
|
||||
- Buy credits upfront
|
||||
- Credits expire after 3 months
|
||||
- Official support
|
||||
- Guaranteed uptime SLA
|
||||
|
||||
**Models Available:**
|
||||
- Stable Diffusion XL
|
||||
- Stable Diffusion 1.5
|
||||
- Their official models only
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Replicate (replicate.com)
|
||||
**What it is:**
|
||||
- Marketplace/platform for running ML models
|
||||
- Hosts models from many sources
|
||||
- Pay-per-use GPU time
|
||||
|
||||
**Business Model:**
|
||||
- Pay only for GPU seconds used
|
||||
- No upfront purchase
|
||||
- No credits that expire
|
||||
- $0.01 minimum charge per prediction
|
||||
|
||||
**Models Available:**
|
||||
- Stability AI's models (SDXL, SD 1.5)
|
||||
- Community models
|
||||
- Fine-tuned variants
|
||||
- Specialized models (LaMa, ControlNet, etc.)
|
||||
- 100+ image generation models
|
||||
|
||||
**Think of it like:**
|
||||
- **Stability AI** = Buying directly from Apple
|
||||
- **Replicate** = App Store with many developers
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Cost Comparison Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario: 100 edits per month
|
||||
|
||||
| Provider | Cost per Image | Monthly Cost | Quality |
|
||||
|----------|---------------|--------------|---------|
|
||||
| DALL-E 2 | $0.020 | $2.00 | ⭐⭐ Poor |
|
||||
| Stability AI | $0.040 | $4.00 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good |
|
||||
| Replicate (SDXL) | $0.025 | $2.50 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent |
|
||||
| Replicate (LaMa) | $0.002 | $0.20 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good for removal |
|
||||
| Local GPU | $0.00 | $0.00* | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Best |
|
||||
|
||||
*Requires $500+ GPU or $0.30-1.00/hr cloud GPU
|
||||
|
||||
### Scenario: 1000 edits per month (Heavy use)
|
||||
|
||||
| Provider | Monthly Cost | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|--------------|-------|
|
||||
| DALL-E 2 | $20.00 | Not worth it |
|
||||
| Stability AI | $40.00 | Need $10-40 credit refills |
|
||||
| Replicate (SDXL) | $25.00 | Pay as you go |
|
||||
| Local GPU | $0.00 | GPU pays for itself after ~50K images |
|
||||
| Cloud GPU (RunPod) | $20-60 | Depends on uptime needed |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Rankings for Inpainting
|
||||
|
||||
**Best to Worst:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Local SDXL Inpainting** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (self-hosted)
|
||||
2. **Replicate SDXL Inpainting** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
|
||||
3. **Stability AI SDXL** ⭐⭐⭐⭐
|
||||
4. **Replicate LaMa** ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (for removal only)
|
||||
5. **DALL-E 2** ⭐⭐ (outdated)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendation by Use Case
|
||||
|
||||
### Best for Testing/Development: Mock Provider
|
||||
- Cost: $0
|
||||
- Quality: N/A (returns original)
|
||||
- Use when: Building/testing UI
|
||||
|
||||
### Best for Low Volume (< 100/month): Replicate
|
||||
- Cost: ~$2.50/month
|
||||
- Quality: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
|
||||
- No minimum purchase
|
||||
- Multiple model options
|
||||
|
||||
### Best for Medium Volume (100-1000/month): Replicate or Stability AI
|
||||
- Replicate: ~$25/month, more flexibility
|
||||
- Stability AI: ~$40/month, simpler API
|
||||
|
||||
### Best for High Volume (1000+/month): Local GPU or Cloud GPU
|
||||
- Unlimited usage
|
||||
- Best quality
|
||||
- Full control
|
||||
|
||||
### Best Overall Value: Replicate
|
||||
- No minimum purchase
|
||||
- Pay only for what you use
|
||||
- Best model selection
|
||||
- Easy to try multiple models
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## My Recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
Start with **Replicate** because:
|
||||
|
||||
1. ✅ No upfront cost (vs Stability's $10 minimum)
|
||||
2. ✅ Better quality than DALL-E 2
|
||||
3. ✅ Can try multiple models to find what works
|
||||
4. ✅ Cheapest per-image for low-medium volume
|
||||
5. ✅ Can switch to Stability AI later if needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Steps:**
|
||||
- I can add Replicate support (30 min of work)
|
||||
- Test with SDXL Inpainting first
|
||||
- Try LaMa for object removal
|
||||
- Fall back to Stability if needed
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like me to add Replicate support?
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user